
The situation
The classic experience: mainstream lender agrees in principle, valuer flags non-standard construction, lender withdraws. Frustrating and expensive if it happens after solicitor instruction.
How we approach it
We identify construction type upfront and route to specialist lenders from day one. Rate and LTV are slightly less generous than standard construction, but availability is what matters when the alternative is 'declined'.
What that looks like in practice
- Timber-frame, thatched, concrete, steel-frame, ex-council all funded
- Typical LTV 70-75% (vs 75-85% standard construction)
- Small rate premium over standard construction mortgages
- Refurbishment routes where non-standard construction is being remediated
- Ex-council flats above 4 storeys handled by specialist lenders
Typical timeline
- Week 1Construction type confirmed, lender shortlist agreed upfront.
- Week 2-4Application, valuation from specialist valuer.
- Week 4-8Offer, completion.
Common questions
Why do standard lenders refuse?
Historic valuation and remediation cost concerns — thatched roof (fire, maintenance), concrete (BISF), timber-frame (some ratings). Specialist lenders assess properly.
How much more does it cost?
Usually 25-75 bps premium over standard construction, small LTV reduction. Not punitive.
Can I refinance later onto mainstream?
Sometimes, if construction type is remediated (e.g. re-thatching cycle documented). Often not — construction is what it is.
Send construction details upfront
We'll route to specialist lenders from day one — avoiding the mainstream-lender withdrawal experience.
